Filevine vs Litify: 2026 Comparison
Filevine and Litify are the two dominant enterprise PI practice management platforms. Both are priced for high-volume PI firms (typically 25+ attorneys with 5,000+ active matters). Both handle PI-specific workflow at depth that general PMS cannot match. The fundamental difference is platform: Filevine is purpose-built; Litify runs on Salesforce.
Pricing: Filevine custom enterprise typically $150-$300+ per user per month plus $25,000-$75,000 implementation fees. Litify custom enterprise typically $200-$400+ per user per month plus Salesforce platform costs and implementation partner fees that often land $50,000-$200,000.
The Verdict
Filevine wins for pure-play PI firms wanting deep PI-specific workflow without Salesforce overhead. Litify wins for firms already in the Salesforce ecosystem or needing Salesforce-data-model integration. Both target enterprise PI; the choice is Salesforce-dependent vs Salesforce-free.
Feature Comparison
| Dimension | Filevine | Litify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (per user) | $150-$300+/mo + setup | $200-$400+/mo + Salesforce + setup |
| Implementation cost | $25K-$75K | $50K-$200K (with partner) |
| Implementation timeline | 3-6 months | 4-12 months (with partner) |
| Customization depth | Strong native | Salesforce-class (deepest possible) |
| PI workflow | Purpose-built, deep | Salesforce-native legal layer |
| Salesforce dependency | None | Required (full platform) |
| Admin requirement | Designated PMS admin | Salesforce admin or partner |
| AI add-ons | DemandsAI, ImmigrationAI native | Salesforce ecosystem AI |
| Reporting | Strong PI-specific | Salesforce-class (very deep) |
| Customer base | Mid-large PI firms | Enterprise legal, often broader-than-PI |
Where Filevine Wins
**Lower total cost.** No Salesforce platform fees, no Salesforce admin overhead, no implementation partner premium. For pure-play PI firms, Filevine usually lands $100,000-$200,000/year cheaper than Litify at comparable scope.
**Faster implementation.** 3-6 months versus 4-12 months for Litify with partner. Faster time-to-value matters at enterprise scale.
**Native PI workflow depth.** Filevine was built around PI from day one. Intake forms, medical records workflow, demand drafting, lien tracking, settlement disbursement all feel native rather than adapted to a general-purpose platform.
**No Salesforce admin requirement.** Designated PMS admin (often a paralegal or ops person) can run Filevine. Litify requires Salesforce admin expertise.
Where Litify Wins
**Salesforce-data-model integration.** For firms running BD on Salesforce, marketing on Pardot, financial reporting through Salesforce data, Litify's data model integration is the cleanest. Filevine requires explicit integration to connect to Salesforce.
**Customization depth.** Salesforce's customization is unlimited in practice. Litify inherits that capability. For firms with very specific requirements that off-the-shelf PMS cannot meet, Litify's Salesforce backbone delivers what custom Filevine configuration cannot.
**Reporting depth.** Salesforce reporting capabilities exceed any purpose-built PMS. For firms wanting cross-function reporting (BD, marketing, finance, operations all in one data model), Litify wins.
**Enterprise procurement comfort.** Litify's Salesforce backbone makes IT and procurement teams more comfortable than purpose-built platforms. Less of a fit issue for legal-led firms; more of a fit issue for corporate-style law firm management.
Choose Filevine if...
your firm is pure-play PI without significant Salesforce-ecosystem footprint, you want lower total cost and faster implementation, or you do not have Salesforce admin expertise in-house. Filevine is the safer pick for most growing PI firms.
Choose Litify if...
your firm already runs on Salesforce (BD, marketing, financial reporting), you have Salesforce admin expertise in-house or budget for a partner, or you have customization requirements that off-the-shelf PMS cannot meet.
Pricing Scenario
**25-attorney PI firm:** Filevine custom $50,000-$120,000/year all-in including implementation. Litify $100,000-$300,000/year including Salesforce platform and partner fees. Annual cost gap: $50,000-$180,000.
**75-attorney mass tort firm:** Filevine custom $150,000-$300,000/year. Litify $300,000-$700,000/year. Annual cost gap: $150,000-$400,000.
Litify's premium is justified specifically by Salesforce-ecosystem integration and customization depth. For pure-play PI firms without Salesforce footprint, the premium is rarely worth it.
Integrations
**Filevine:** Native PI-specific tooling (DemandsAI, ImmigrationAI), QuickBooks, calendar, email, e-filing, payments, document storage, plus growing partner ecosystem. Salesforce integration available but explicit (not native).
**Litify:** Full Salesforce ecosystem (AppExchange marketplace, Pardot marketing, Salesforce CRM, Tableau analytics, Slack, etc.). Native data-model integration with any Salesforce-based tooling.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more expensive over 3 years?
Litify, by $200,000-$1,500,000+ depending on firm size. Salesforce platform fees ($25-$300+/user/month additional), implementation partner fees, ongoing Salesforce admin costs, and AppExchange add-ons all add up. Filevine's purpose-built model eliminates most of these line items.
Can a PI firm without Salesforce expertise run Litify?
Difficult and expensive. Litify requires ongoing Salesforce admin work that most PI firms outsource to a Salesforce implementation partner ($150-$300/hour ongoing). Filevine is designed for designated PMS admins (paralegal or ops person) who can run the platform without specialized expertise.
When does Litify's customization depth justify the premium?
When the firm has customization requirements that cannot be met by Filevine's native configuration. This is rare in pure-play PI but more common in mass tort, multi-firm consolidations, or PI firms with substantial non-PI practice (employment, mass arbitration). For firms with broader practice areas and Salesforce already in place, Litify's flexibility is the right pick.
Can I migrate from Filevine to Litify or back?
Yes, but plan for 6-12 months and seven-figure costs at typical firm sizes. Migrations between enterprise PI platforms are major projects requiring data mapping, workflow rebuild, integration reconfiguration, and extensive staff retraining. Pick the right platform initially; migrations are not casual undertakings.
What about implementation timeline and what should we budget?
Filevine implementations run 3-6 months with $25,000-$75,000 in partner fees for mid-large firms. Litify implementations run 4-12 months with $50,000-$200,000+ in Salesforce partner fees. Litify's longer timeline reflects the Salesforce platform configuration overhead, not the legal workflow setup. Plan for the slower side of those ranges on first deployments. Both platforms deliver a working production system; the speed difference matters most when the firm is actively losing money to broken existing workflows.
How do AI add-ons compare on these platforms?
Filevine ships native AI add-ons (DemandsAI for demand letters, ImmigrationAI for I-589 and related work) priced as add-ons to the platform. Litify integrates with Salesforce ecosystem AI (Einstein, plus third-party AI tools in the AppExchange). For PI-specific AI workflow, Filevine's native add-ons are tighter integrated. For broader AI capability across deal work, Litify's Salesforce ecosystem reach is wider. Most PI firms running EvenUp, Eve, or Supio as separate vendors get comparable AI value regardless of PMS platform.
Which platform has better customer success and support?
Filevine has a dedicated PI-focused customer success organization. Customers report strong support response and PI-specific guidance. Litify support runs through Salesforce ecosystem partners and the Litify product team. For firms without Salesforce expertise in-house, Litify support requires more partner engagement. Pure-play PI firms generally report stronger out-of-box support with Filevine; Salesforce-fluent firms find Litify support fits their model.
How do the two handle mass tort and MDL workflow?
Both handle mass tort and MDL workflow at depth. Filevine ships purpose-built mass tort capability including bellwether tracking, plaintiff demographic data, claim status flows, and settlement disbursement at scale. Litify on Salesforce handles mass tort through configurable matter records and Salesforce reporting, which gives the deepest reporting but requires more configuration work to match Filevine's out-of-box mass tort fit. For firms running primarily mass tort, Filevine wins on time-to-value. For firms running mass tort plus other complex litigation where Salesforce's data model already houses BD and marketing data, Litify's unified data story wins. Settlement disbursement specifically (lien resolution, multi-plaintiff distribution math, MDL escrow tracking) is comparable on both platforms.
How does Filevine pricing compare across firm sizes in practice?
Filevine pricing scales reasonably linearly with seat count for typical PI operations. A 25-attorney PI firm sees per-user pricing around $150-$250/mo depending on tier and AI add-ons (DemandsAI, ImmigrationAI). A 75-attorney firm negotiates better per-seat economics, typically landing $130-$200/mo with volume discounts. A 200-attorney mass tort operation runs custom enterprise with effective per-seat costs around $100-$170/mo. Implementation fees do not scale linearly with firm size, which means very large firms see better total cost economics than the mid-tier. For firms growing from 25 to 75 attorneys over 3 years, plan for the per-seat cost to drop 15-25% at renewal as volume discounts kick in.
Explore More
Reviewed by Rome Thorndike. Last verified 2026-05-23.
Pricing, features, and ratings are based on vendor documentation, public filings, product demos, and feedback from sales teams using these tools in production. We update reviews when vendors ship major releases or change pricing.